Free Ram Optimizer

General discussion about Acelogix Software products
Keizer
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:05 pm

Free Ram Optimizer

Post by Keizer » Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:25 pm

Note: WinXP has a very state-of-the-art memory management, and you won't notice any performance improvement when using memory optimizers. All such optimizers/boosters available on the market - both freeware and trialware - are useless for XP and others to follow. Such programs are recommended for 95/98/ME only.
What about windows 2000, is memory management software useless in win2k?

billybob
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:35 am

Re: Free Ram Optimizer

Post by billybob » Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:41 am

Note: WinXP has a very state-of-the-art memory management, and you won't notice any performance improvement when using memory optimizers. All such optimizers/boosters available on the market - both freeware and trialware - are useless for XP and others to follow. Such programs are recommended for 95/98/ME only.
I'm not precisely sure where you retrieved this information from, but it is unfortunately mostly correct. Though Ram optimizers do make a little bit of difference, I tend not to use them, as I genuinely don't see much improvement whilst using it. Same applies for Win2k I'm afraid as XP and Windows 2000 are pretty much identical :(

hari
Site Admin
Posts: 685
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:15 am

Post by hari » Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:59 am

James, that info is given at the acelogix site itself ;)
regards,
Hari, Acelogix Team

jazzbodepew
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:18 pm
Location: 40.136976 N, 87.621737 W
Contact:

*********************

Post by jazzbodepew » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:00 am

James
I bet Alex P Kowalski and Mark Russinovich would argue the point with ya..
About memory managers...
Point mute;WinXP/2K are pretty good I reckons..
If your into them In my opinion the best is "RamPage1.6"
Good ole DOS 2.0
jazz...............aka...............DenB............
~ ~
***JAZZ OO SAYS***
ACE----oooO--(_)---Oooo---EXCELS

billybob
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:35 am

Re: *********************

Post by billybob » Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:10 am

jazzbodepew wrote:James
I bet Alex P Kowalski and Mark Russinovich would argue the point with ya..
About memory managers...
Point mute;WinXP/2K are pretty good I reckons..
If your into them In my opinion the best is "RamPage1.6"
Good ole DOS 2.0
jazz...............aka...............DenB............
Perhaps mate, but the thing is, I've used alot of Ram Optimizers in my computing lifetime, and to be honest, I found just going out to PC World and buying 2 new ram drives easier than trying to find a good Ram Optimizer that only frees a few kilobytes anyway..

jazzbodepew
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:18 pm
Location: 40.136976 N, 87.621737 W
Contact:

Hey Hey

Post by jazzbodepew » Sun Nov 13, 2005 1:57 pm

"It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas!" :idea:
Location: 40.136976 N, 87.621737 W

jazz...............aka............DenB...........
~ ~
***JAZZ OO SAYS***
ACE----oooO--(_)---Oooo---EXCELS

SteinerCS
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 7:35 am

Post by SteinerCS » Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:43 pm

RAM optimizing software is [garbage]. Windows XP manages memory better than any "optimizing" software. All the software does is steal the mrmory away from the programs to make it look like you have regained RAM and still have all your programs running perfectly. If you start maximizing windows and clicking menus within them, you will notice that the memory was simply taken away from your programs and put back in the "Free Memory" portion again. That's crap.

Post Reply